H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Younes El Aynaoui vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 1-0
Younes El Aynaoui holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Younes El Aynaoui leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Younes El Aynaoui won the 2002 Long Island third round 5-7 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 54
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2002* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Younes El Aynaoui | 5-7 7-6(5) 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Younes El Aynaoui | #1,592 | #14 | 1,635 | 1,923 | 243 | 219 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Younes El Aynaoui | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #311 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1993 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #51 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1994 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1996 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 1998 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2000 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #25 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2001 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #22 | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #644 | 1,739 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #228 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,610 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #201 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #720 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |