H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Younes El Aynaoui vs S. Sargsian H2H: 0-1
S. Sargsian holds a 1–0 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, S. Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, S. Sargsian won the 2000 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-6(1) 4-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 54
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2000* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | S. Sargsian | 7-6(1) 4-2 (ret.) | Younes El Aynaoui | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Younes El Aynaoui | #1,592 | #14 | 1,635 | 1,923 | 243 | 219 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| S. Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Younes El Aynaoui | S. Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #311 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #51 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #25 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #22 | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #644 | 1,739 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2005 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #228 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,610 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #201 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #720 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |