H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Younes El Aynaoui vs Thomas Muster H2H: 2-1

Younes El Aynaoui holds a 2–1 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Younes El Aynaoui leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Younes El Aynaoui won the 1996 Qatar Open semifinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 54 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Younes El Aynaoui #110 6-4 6-4 Thomas Muster #3 Match data Jan 6, 1996* SF Qatar Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Thomas Muster #13 6-1 6-3 Younes El Aynaoui #88 Match data Aug 7, 1993* QF Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Younes El Aynaoui #432 4-6 6-4 6-3 Thomas Muster #38 Match data Mar 20, 1992* R16 Casablanca ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 244 221 52.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Thomas Muster
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0
18 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1992 3–2 60.0% #311 1,532 0 0 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5
21 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,636 0 0 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5
22 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,516 0 0 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8
23 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,562 0 0 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10
24 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,568 0 0 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13
25 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20
26 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23
27 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,720 0 1 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35
28 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,717 0 1 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42
29 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,823 0 2 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44
30 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44
31 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,835 0 5 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44
32 2004 0–5 0.0% #644 1,730 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,592 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,615 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,698 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,689 0 5 — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44
43 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Thomas Muster
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1992 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
21 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 8 17 25 32.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1996 9 10 19 47.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1998 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6%
28 2000 15 12 27 55.6% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2%
29 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 20 12 32 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
30 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2003 23 12 35 65.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2004 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 93 183 49.2% 135 102 237 57.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 9 16 25 36.0% — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 88/97 of Younes El Aynaoui's and 527/612 of Thomas Muster's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Thomas Muster
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5%
31 2003 58/64 10.7 2.9 65.7% 75.4% 50.8% 67.6% 41.2% 66.9% 35.2% 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2%
32 2004 4/5 1.0 3.3 64.2% 48.9% 32.0% 46.9% 0.0% 42.4% 21.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 11/11 2.4 3.5 61.8% 60.7% 40.1% 48.9% 25.2% 52.9% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 3/4 5.7 2.0 56.4% 78.3% 53.6% 57.8% 33.0% 67.0% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 4/4 5.0 1.8 67.9% 69.5% 44.5% 53.4% 35.1% 62.0% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 6/7 9.5 2.7 64.0% 77.9% 48.6% 64.3% 58.3% 67.4% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 2/2 8.0 3.0 59.3% 78.4% 40.6% 58.3% 12.5% 62.9% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9%
Career — 88/465 8.6 2.9 64.7% 72.4% 48.0% 62.9% 37.3% 63.8% 34.1% — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Thomas Muster
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
18 1990 1492 103.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.05 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.8 -1.90
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) 105.9 -0.14
20 1992 1532 116.7 — — — — — +42 — 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +0.45 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) 109.8 -1.96
21 1993 1637 136.8 — — — — -93 +76 — 51.4% +0.19 8–6 (57%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 +0.77 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) 100.8 +0.55
22 1994 1517 125.5 — — — — +44 +45 — 37.8% -0.75 3–9 (25%) 7–9 (44%) 94.7 +1.14 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) 105.7 +0.89
23 1995 1562 110.8 — — — — -30 +67 — 48.0% -0.32 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.06 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 98.2 -0.44
24 1996 1569 135.0 — — — — +36 +10 — 46.3% -0.22 6–6 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 103.7 -0.66 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) 102.9 +0.43
25 1997 1582 114.0 — — — — — +36 — 50.0% -0.25 — 2–0 — +0.10 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) 99.6 +2.71
26 1998 1664 129.0 — — — — — +55 — 69.2% +0.69 0–1 1–0 — -0.43 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) 95.8 +0.94
27 1999 1721 149.4 — — — — -67 +83 — 56.9% +0.53 5–10 (33%) 11–10 (52%) 97.9 -2.15 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) 110.0 -0.55
28 2000 1717 137.4 — — — — -35 +105 -161 57.7% +0.27 11–11 (50%) 22–12 (65%) 103.5 +1.57 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) 105.9 +1.60
29 2001 1823 138.8 — — — — -113 +14 -234 55.9% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 19–13 (59%) 105.8 -0.38 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) 97.2 -0.07
30 2002 1774 143.3 — — — — -28 +122 — 57.1% +0.34 16–10 (62%) 16–13 (55%) 102.1 -0.43 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) 99.0 -1.16
31 2003 1835 143.2 +4.34 -1.40 1.064 51.1% +15 -32 -219 59.6% +0.49 12–10 (55%) 25–19 (57%) 101.2 +1.73 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -1.42
32 2004 1731 108.3 -5.09 -3.78 0.366 33.4% +8 — — 0.0% -4.17 — — — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1592 109.0 -4.60 -4.26 0.672 42.5% +43 +145 — 16.0% -2.44 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 1608 110.3 +0.93 +2.53 1.201 52.2% +26 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1615 121.2 -0.65 +0.01 0.814 46.6% +66 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 1699 118.9 +2.44 +0.53 1.125 52.9% — +102 — 73.3% +1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1689 101.0 -1.64 -2.05 0.830 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
Career — 1923 143.4 +2.19 -1.55 0.940 49.1% -17 +62 -210 53.2% +0.12 76–76 (50%) 124–100 (55%) 104.2 +0.59 — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.