H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Younes El Aynaoui vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-3

Tim Henman holds a 3–0 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-1 6-0.

MAR Age 55 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 3
3 main-draw meetings
GBR Age 52 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #6 6-1 6-0 Younes El Aynaoui #64 Match data Aug 4, 2004* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tim Henman #11 4-6 6-2 7-6(2) Younes El Aynaoui #21 Match data Aug 18, 2000* R16 Indianapolis ATP International Series Gold modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tim Henman #7 4-6 6-3 6-0 Younes El Aynaoui #45 Match data Jan 8, 1999* R16 Qatar Open ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 244 221 52.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1992 3–2 60.0% #311 1,532 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,636 0 0 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,516 0 0 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,562 0 0 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,568 0 0 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,720 0 1 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,717 0 1 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,823 0 2 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,835 0 5 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 2004 0–5 0.0% #644 1,730 0 5 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11
33 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,592 0 5
34 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,607 0 5
35 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,615 0 5
36 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,698 0 5
38 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,689 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1992 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 8 17 25 32.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1996 9 10 19 47.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1998 5 2 7 71.4% 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2000 15 12 27 55.6% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 20 12 32 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2003 23 12 35 65.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2004 0 5 5 0.0% 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2005 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
34 2006 2 2 4 50.0%
35 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 2008 5 2 7 71.4%
38 2010 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 90 93 183 49.2% 135 102 237 57.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 9 16 25 36.0% 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 88/97 of Younes El Aynaoui's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 —/— 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 —/— 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 —/— 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 —/— 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 —/— 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 —/— 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 —/— 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 —/— 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 —/— 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 —/— 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 —/— 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 —/— 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 2003 58/64 10.7 2.9 65.7% 75.4% 50.8% 67.6% 41.2% 66.9% 35.2% 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 2004 4/5 1.0 3.3 64.2% 48.9% 32.0% 46.9% 0.0% 42.4% 21.1% 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
33 2005 11/11 2.4 3.5 61.8% 60.7% 40.1% 48.9% 25.2% 52.9% 31.7% —/—
34 2006 3/4 5.7 2.0 56.4% 78.3% 53.6% 57.8% 33.0% 67.0% 39.6% —/—
35 2007 4/4 5.0 1.8 67.9% 69.5% 44.5% 53.4% 35.1% 62.0% 30.9% —/—
36 2008 6/7 9.5 2.7 64.0% 77.9% 48.6% 64.3% 58.3% 67.4% 36.7% —/—
38 2010 2/2 8.0 3.0 59.3% 78.4% 40.6% 58.3% 12.5% 62.9% 30.8% —/—
Career 88/465 8.6 2.9 64.7% 72.4% 48.0% 62.9% 37.3% 63.8% 34.1% 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1990 1492 103.5 0.0% -2.50 0–1 -0.05
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 -0.33
20 1992 1532 116.8 +42 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) +0.45 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 101.9 -0.04
21 1993 1637 136.8 -93 +76 51.4% +0.19 8–6 (57%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 +0.77 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) 102.6 -0.81
22 1994 1517 125.5 +44 +45 37.8% -0.75 3–9 (25%) 7–9 (44%) 94.7 +1.14 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) 105.8 +0.85
23 1995 1562 110.8 -30 +67 48.0% -0.32 1–0 2–1 (67%) +1.06 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) 104.5 -1.62
24 1996 1569 135.0 +36 +10 46.3% -0.22 6–6 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 103.7 -0.66 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) 95.6 +0.72
25 1997 1582 114.0 +36 50.0% -0.25 2–0 +0.10 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) 100.3 +0.25
26 1998 1664 129.0 +55 69.2% +0.69 0–1 1–0 -0.43 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) 96.3 +2.30
27 1999 1721 149.4 -67 +83 56.9% +0.53 5–10 (33%) 11–10 (52%) 97.9 -2.15 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) 94.1 +0.21
28 2000 1717 137.4 -35 +105 -161 57.7% +0.27 11–11 (50%) 22–12 (65%) 103.5 +1.57 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) 104.5 -2.72
29 2001 1823 138.8 -113 +14 -234 55.9% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 19–13 (59%) 105.8 -0.38 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) 95.8 +0.11
30 2002 1774 143.3 -28 +122 57.1% +0.34 16–10 (62%) 16–13 (55%) 102.1 -0.43 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 91.8 +0.77
31 2003 1835 143.2 +4.34 -1.40 1.064 51.1% +15 -32 -219 59.6% +0.49 12–10 (55%) 25–19 (57%) 101.2 +1.73 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -17 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) 95.7 -2.94
32 2004 1731 108.3 -5.09 -3.78 0.366 33.4% +8 0.0% -4.17 -0.47 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) 84.9 +0.06
33 2005 1592 108.9 -4.60 -4.26 0.672 42.5% +43 +145 16.0% -2.44 0–2 1–3 (25%) +0.39
34 2006 1608 110.3 +0.93 +2.53 1.201 52.2% +26 66.7% +0.50 0–1 -0.20
35 2007 1615 121.2 -0.65 +0.01 0.814 46.6% +66 33.3% -1.22 0–1 3–0 (100%) -0.31
36 2008 1699 118.9 +2.44 +0.53 1.125 52.9% +102 73.3% +1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.21
38 2010 1689 101.0 -1.64 -2.05 0.830 46.2% 50.0% -1.50 2–0 +0.37
Career 1923 143.4 +2.19 -1.55 0.940 49.1% -17 +62 -210 53.2% +0.12 76–76 (50%) 124–100 (55%) 104.2 +0.59 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.