H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Younes El Aynaoui vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-3

Tim Henman holds a 3–0 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 54 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 4, 2004* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #6 6-1 6-0 Younes El Aynaoui #64 Match data
Aug 14, 2000 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #11 4-6 6-2 7-6(2) Younes El Aynaoui #21 Match data
Jan 8, 1999* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #7 4-6 6-3 6-0 Younes El Aynaoui #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 243 219 52.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1992 2–1 66.7% #311 1,519 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,632 0 0 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,515 0 0 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,561 0 0 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,569 0 0 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,727 0 1 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,714 0 1 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,822 0 2 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,828 0 5 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2004 0–4 0.0% #644 1,739 0 5 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11
33 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,597 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,610 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,617 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,688 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,679 0 5 — — — — — — —