H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yuichi Sugita vs Mate Pavic H2H: 1-0
Yuichi Sugita holds a 1–0 lead over Mate Pavic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yuichi Sugita leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yuichi Sugita won the 2017 Chengdu third round 6-1 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 37
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 33
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2017* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Yuichi Sugita | 6-1 0-0 (ret.) | Mate Pavic | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2015* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | Q3 | Grass | Mate Pavic | 6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-4 | Yuichi Sugita | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yuichi Sugita | #1,090 | #36 | 1,240 | 1,848 | 47 | 82 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mate Pavic | #974 | #295 | 150 | 1,611 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yuichi Sugita | Mate Pavic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #369 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #412 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #638 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #235 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #933 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #112 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #145 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |