H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Yuichi Sugita vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 0-1
Takao Suzuki holds a 1–0 lead over Yuichi Sugita in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Takao Suzuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 2008 Tokyo second round 6-3 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 37
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2008* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Takao Suzuki | 6-3 7-6(6) | Yuichi Sugita | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yuichi Sugita | #1,090 | #36 | 1,240 | 1,848 | 47 | 82 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Takao Suzuki | #1,016 | #102 | 470 | 1,669 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yuichi Sugita | Takao Suzuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #235 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #262 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #225 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #205 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #112 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #145 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #471 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #509 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2021 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |