H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Zachary Svajda vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 1-0
Zachary Svajda holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zachary Svajda leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zachary Svajda won the 2021 US Open first round 7-6(6) 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 23
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Zachary Svajda | 7-6(6) 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zachary Svajda | #72 | #62 | 875 | 1,748 | 16 | 29 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zachary Svajda | Marco Cecchinato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #914 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #389 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #166 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |