H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Zhe Li vs Kevin Anderson H2H: 0-1
Kevin Anderson holds a 1–0 lead over Zhe Li in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kevin Anderson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Anderson won the 2016 Shanghai Masters second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
China
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 40
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2016* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kevin Anderson | 6-1 6-3 | Zhe Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhe Li | #1,094 | #193 | 261 | 1,500 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kevin Anderson | #1,151 | #5 | 4,845 | 2,142 | 347 | 251 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zhe Li | Kevin Anderson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #385 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #285 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #61 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,358 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #32 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #521 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #37 | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,958 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #12 | 2,046 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #67 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #14 | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 2,123 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #91 | 2,057 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #81 | 1,964 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #104 | 1,681 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #627 | 1,669 | 0 | 7 |