Zhe Li
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalibor Svrcina | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 23, 2023 | H2H |
| Lucas Pouille | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 8, 2019 | H2H |
| Daniel Evans | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 3, 2019 | H2H |
| Egor Gerasimov | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 26, 2019 | H2H |
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 16, 2019 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Zhe Li vs Lukasz Kubot
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Zhe Li vs Lukasz Kubot.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Kubot | 6-2 4-6 7-6(7) | Zhe Li | Match data | Oct 10, 2010 | Q2 | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhe Li | #1,094 | #193 | 261 | 1,500 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zhe Li | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #385 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #285 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #72 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,358 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #521 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Zhe Li | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33 | 62 | 95 | 34.7% | 36 | 45 | 81 | 44.4% | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 11/11 of Zhe Li's and 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Zhe Li | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 62.7% | 73.6% | 41.1% | 52.8% | 16.7% | 61.9% | 40.0% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 83.0% | 47.7% | 55.6% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 49.1% | 27.5% |
| 24 | 2011 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 66.7% | 64.7% | 28.6% | 44.4% | 0.0% | 52.3% | 29.1% | 2006 | 10/10 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 61.6% | 62.6% | 44.2% | 52.3% | 33.1% | 55.4% | 33.8% |
| 25 | 2012 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 59.2% | 51.7% | 40.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 46.9% | 30.2% | 2007 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 60.8% | 58.5% | 40.6% | 21.7% | 46.8% | 50.4% | 41.3% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 18/18 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 62.5% | 70.6% | 49.6% | 57.5% | 37.8% | 63.0% | 36.1% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 38/39 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 62.5% | 66.5% | 45.5% | 54.0% | 47.5% | 58.7% | 37.0% |
| 29 | 2016 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 60.0% | 56.0% | 39.9% | 31.8% | 0.0% | 49.7% | 21.5% | 2011 | 34/34 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 61.4% | 70.1% | 46.4% | 56.6% | 52.7% | 60.9% | 37.0% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 47/48 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 61.4% | 69.3% | 48.3% | 58.0% | 39.7% | 61.2% | 37.0% |
| 31 | 2018 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 80.5% | 58.6% | 41.2% | 72.7% | 100.0% | 55.2% | 28.8% | 2013 | 26/27 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 62.6% | 67.8% | 45.0% | 52.0% | 41.4% | 59.2% | 37.1% |
| 32 | 2019 | 4/4 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 67.4% | 61.3% | 54.9% | 40.2% | 45.8% | 59.6% | 32.0% | 2014 | 17/17 | 7.6 | 5.7 | 59.9% | 69.1% | 48.8% | 57.0% | 33.4% | 60.8% | 32.4% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3/3 | 8.0 | 4.3 | 65.8% | 68.0% | 54.5% | 69.4% | 14.3% | 63.4% | 31.7% |
| 36 | 2023 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 47.2% | 68.0% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 12.5% | 58.5% | 27.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 11/11 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 64.5% | 60.4% | 44.3% | 41.5% | 36.0% | 54.8% | 28.7% | — | 199/202 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 61.9% | 68.2% | 46.9% | 55.2% | 41.9% | 60.1% | 36.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Zhe Li | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 2007 | 1483 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 1465 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1514 | 104.6 | +0.89 | +0.01 | 1.051 | 50.3% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 23 | 2010 | 1481 | 105.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1484 | 98.6 | +2.62 | -3.59 | 0.539 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.11 |
| 24 | 2011 | 1464 | 100.3 | -1.62 | -0.86 | 0.610 | 41.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.30 | 2006 | 1552 | 111.5 | -2.84 | -0.81 | 0.759 | 45.1% | +43 | — | — | 36.7% | -1.37 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–1 | — | +0.02 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1463 | 105.5 | -2.28 | +3.74 | 0.570 | 39.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 | 2007 | 1486 | 99.1 | -3.22 | -0.28 | 0.831 | 45.7% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -1.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 26 | 2013 | 1451 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1507 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 1431 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1730 | 130.5 | -0.39 | +0.74 | 0.974 | 49.4% | -21 | -13 | — | 51.2% | -0.07 | 2–5 (29%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.0 | -0.34 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1653 | 134.9 | -3.52 | +0.17 | 0.895 | 48.1% | +52 | -19 | -182 | 41.7% | -0.46 | 2–7 (22%) | 4–9 (31%) | 92.0 | +0.09 |
| 29 | 2016 | 1431 | 103.7 | -3.04 | -0.21 | 0.427 | 37.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | -0.04 | 2011 | 1819 | 141.7 | -1.34 | -0.12 | 0.947 | 49.2% | -93 | -18 | -86 | 49.0% | -0.07 | 10–7 (59%) | 11–7 (61%) | 109.1 | +0.47 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1716 | 137.7 | -1.80 | +0.15 | 0.952 | 49.5% | -31 | +48 | -3 | 45.8% | -0.14 | 6–8 (43%) | 8–10 (44%) | 99.9 | +0.63 |
| 31 | 2018 | 1397 | 96.3 | -0.72 | -1.72 | 0.643 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.36 | 2013 | 1667 | 126.1 | -3.42 | -0.55 | 0.908 | 48.2% | -63 | +74 | +118 | 41.1% | -0.52 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–4 (56%) | 96.6 | +1.16 |
| 32 | 2019 | 1359 | 111.3 | -1.64 | -0.62 | 0.792 | 45.8% | +1 | — | — | 18.2% | -2.09 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.05 | 2014 | 1670 | 124.3 | -1.32 | -2.59 | 0.827 | 47.1% | -101 | +15 | +100 | 40.8% | -0.73 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–3 (50%) | 95.1 | -0.27 |
| 33 | 2020 | 1404 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1698 | 119.7 | -2.83 | +2.52 | 0.866 | 48.0% | -40 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.72 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.21 |
| 34 | 2021 | 1416 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1654 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 1405 | 98.8 | +0.75 | -2.02 | 0.661 | 43.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1500 | 105.0 | -1.65 | -0.42 | 0.635 | 42.5% | +1 | — | — | 8.0% | -2.88 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +6.45 | — | 1871 | 133.5 | -2.13 | -0.20 | 0.909 | 48.4% | -30 | +7 | +8 | 43.9% | -0.40 | 26–45 (37%) | 39–39 (50%) | 98.9 | +0.69 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Lukasz Kubot
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jan 1, 2014 | H2H |
| Benoit Paire | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 30, 2013 | H2H |
| Nicolas Almagro | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 18, 2012 | H2H |
| Igor Andreev | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jun 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Potito Starace | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 15, 2012 | H2H |