H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Abigail Spears vs María Emilia Salerni H2H: 0-1
María Emilia Salerni holds a 1–0 lead over Abigail Spears in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, María Emilia Salerni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, María Emilia Salerni won the 2007 Beijing fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2007* | Beijing | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | María Emilia Salerni | 6-2 7-5 | Abigail Spears | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abigail Spears | #1,280 | #66 | 522 | 1,604 | 21 | 41 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,553 | 30 | 60 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Abigail Spears | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #323 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #159 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #147 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #329 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |