H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Adriana Rikl Gersi vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 0-1

Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Rikl Gersi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2000 Bratislava round of 16 2-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Adriana Rikl Gersi
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #73 2-6 6-4 6-2 Adriana Rikl Gersi #67 Match data Oct 27, 2000* R16 Bratislava Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Adriana Rikl Gersi #898 #48 551 1,644 54 91 37.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Adriana Rikl Gersi Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0
20 1996 4–3 57.1% #99 1,543 0 0 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0
21 1997 6–16 27.3% #92 1,494 0 0 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 1998 9–15 37.5% #63 1,543 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0
23 1999 9–15 37.5% #77 1,545 0 0 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 2000 12–16 42.9% #68 1,558 0 0 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0
25 2001 13–16 44.8% #73 1,594 0 1 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0
26 2002 1–10 9.1% #348 1,486 0 1 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Adriana Rikl Gersi Miriam Oremans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2002 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
Career — 22 42 64 34.4% 28 36 64 43.8% 1 8 9 11.1% 3 5 8 37.5% — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Adriana Rikl Gersi Miriam Oremans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45
20 1996 1544 113.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.1% +0.64 — — — +0.50 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65
21 1997 1495 116.4 — — — — +50 +58 — 32.6% -1.30 1–2 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 97.2 +0.69 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41
22 1998 1544 116.8 — — — — +16 +17 +16 37.7% -0.96 5–4 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 102.3 -0.33 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91
23 1999 1546 110.5 — — — — -41 +63 — 37.7% -0.74 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41
24 2000 1559 109.6 — — — — -8 +53 — 38.6% -0.95 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 102.6 +0.30 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65
25 2001 1594 115.4 — — — — -53 +84 — 43.3% -0.55 6–3 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 106.2 -0.28 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25
26 2002 1486 100.9 — — — — -14 +145 — 16.7% -2.08 0–2 — — +0.07 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42
Career — 1644 116.3 — — — — -7 +66 +16 37.6% -0.89 20–15 (57%) 11–14 (44%) 106.3 +0.83 — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.