H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriana Rikl Gersi vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 1-2
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 2–1 lead over Adriana Rikl Gersi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 2–0 on clay, while Adriana Rikl Gersi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Adriana Rikl Gersi won the 1998 Hanover third round 6-1 6-7 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1998* | Hanover | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Adriana Rikl Gersi | 6-1 6-7 7-6 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data |
| May 1, 1997* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-4 6-3 | Adriana Rikl Gersi | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1997* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-2 6-1 | Adriana Rikl Gersi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Rikl Gersi | #898 | #48 | 551 | 1,646 | 54 | 90 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Rikl Gersi | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #99 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #63 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #77 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 2002 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #348 | 1,486 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 |