H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Adriana Serra Zanetti vs Julia Schruff H2H: 2-0
Adriana Serra Zanetti holds a 2–0 lead over Julia Schruff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Adriana Serra Zanetti leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Adriana Serra Zanetti won the 2004 Hyderabad third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 50
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2004* | Hyderabad | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Adriana Serra Zanetti | 6-3 6-2 | Julia Schruff | Match data |
| Jul 10, 2003* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Adriana Serra Zanetti | 6-0 6-4 | Julia Schruff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Serra Zanetti | #1,006 | #38 | 797 | 1,633 | 57 | 116 | 32.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Schruff | #1,200 | #52 | 536 | 1,665 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adriana Serra Zanetti | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #168 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #123 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #125 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #60 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #106 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #258 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |