H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriana Serra Zanetti vs Lenka Nemeckova H2H: 0-1
Lenka Nemeckova holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Serra Zanetti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lenka Nemeckova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lenka Nemeckova won the 2000 Sao Paulo third round 6-0 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 50
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2000* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lenka Nemeckova | 6-0 5-7 6-3 | Adriana Serra Zanetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Serra Zanetti | #1,006 | #38 | 797 | 1,633 | 57 | 116 | 32.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lenka Nemeckova | #787 | #72 | 337 | 1,570 | 27 | 46 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adriana Serra Zanetti | Lenka Nemeckova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #168 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #123 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #125 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #155 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #136 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #60 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #106 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #258 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |