H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriana Serra Zanetti vs Linda Wild H2H: 0-1
Linda Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Serra Zanetti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1994 US Open first round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 50
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Linda Wild | 6-0 6-4 | Adriana Serra Zanetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Serra Zanetti | #1,006 | #38 | 797 | 1,633 | 57 | 116 | 32.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adriana Serra Zanetti | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #168 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #123 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #125 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #60 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #106 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #258 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 |