H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Adriana Serra Zanetti vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 0-2
Silvija Talaja holds a 2–0 lead over Adriana Serra Zanetti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvija Talaja leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2004 Seoul third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 50
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2004* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Silvija Talaja | 6-3 6-4 | Adriana Serra Zanetti | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2002* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Silvija Talaja | 7-5 6-2 | Adriana Serra Zanetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Serra Zanetti | #1,006 | #38 | 797 | 1,633 | 57 | 116 | 32.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adriana Serra Zanetti | Silvija Talaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #168 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #123 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #125 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #60 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #106 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #258 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |