H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ai Sugiyama vs Akiko Morigami H2H: 5-0
Ai Sugiyama holds a 5–0 lead over Akiko Morigami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ai Sugiyama leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ai Sugiyama won the 2006 Wimbledon second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 51
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Ai Sugiyama | 6-2 7-5 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
| Sep 22, 2005* | Beijing | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2005* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-4 4-3 (ret.) | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
| May 21, 2004* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Ai Sugiyama | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2002* | Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-3 7-5 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | #97 | #8 | 2,400 | 1,951 | 411 | 362 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ai Sugiyama | Akiko Morigami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #184 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #145 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #46 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #21 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #18 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #32 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #30 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #10 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,802 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,632 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #31 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |