H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ai Sugiyama vs Amy Frazier H2H: 1-4
Amy Frazier holds a 4–1 lead over Ai Sugiyama in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2005 Eastbourne third round 4-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 51
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2005* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Amy Frazier | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Amy Frazier | 6-4 6-2 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1999* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Amy Frazier | 6-2 6-2 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Amy Frazier | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1997* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | #97 | #8 | 2,400 | 1,951 | 411 | 362 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ai Sugiyama | Amy Frazier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #184 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #145 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #46 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1996 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1997 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #21 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #18 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #32 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #30 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2002 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2003 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #10 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,802 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2005 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2006 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,632 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2008 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #31 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 |