H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Ai Sugiyama vs Anne Kremer H2H: 3-0

Ai Sugiyama holds a 3–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ai Sugiyama leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ai Sugiyama won the 2002 Charleston second round 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ai Sugiyama
JPN Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 17, 2002* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Ai Sugiyama #29 3-6 6-4 6-4 Anne Kremer #21 Match data
Oct 21, 1999* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Ai Sugiyama #27 6-1 3-6 6-2 Anne Kremer #36 Match data
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Ai Sugiyama #29 7-5 6-4 Anne Kremer #154 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ai Sugiyama #97 #8 2,400 1,951 411 362 53.2% 0 0 0 4 2 6
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ai Sugiyama Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 1–4 20.0% #184 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 3–8 27.3% #145 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1994 9–11 45.0% #72 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 16–17 48.5% #46 1,691 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1996 22–18 55.0% #28 1,738 0 0 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 1997 31–25 55.4% #21 1,833 0 1 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 1998 37–21 63.8% #18 1,859 0 3 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 1999 27–23 54.0% #24 1,806 0 3 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2000 20–24 45.5% #32 1,687 0 3 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2001 28–25 52.8% #30 1,720 0 3 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2002 35–26 57.4% #24 1,755 0 3 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 2003 44–25 63.8% #10 1,915 0 5 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 2004 30–22 57.7% #17 1,802 0 6 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 2005 28–27 50.9% #29 1,742 0 6 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 2006 28–25 52.8% #26 1,742 0 6 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 2007 17–21 44.7% #38 1,632 0 6 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 2008 26–21 55.3% #31 1,742 0 6 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 2009 9–19 32.1% #97 1,647 0 6 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2