H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ai Sugiyama vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-1
Ai Sugiyama and Asa Carlsson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on clay, while Ai Sugiyama leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ai Sugiyama won the 2000 Australian Open third round 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 51
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| May 19, 1995* | British Clay Court Champs | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Asa Carlsson | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | #97 | #8 | 2,400 | 1,951 | 411 | 362 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ai Sugiyama | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #184 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #145 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #46 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #21 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #18 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #32 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #30 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #10 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,802 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,632 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #31 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |