H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Ai Sugiyama vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 0-3

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–0 lead over Ai Sugiyama in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2003 Indian Wells fourth round 0-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ai Sugiyama
JPN Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #12 0-6 6-4 6-4 Ai Sugiyama #18 Match data
Jun 21, 2001* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Chanda Rubin #27 6-3 4-6 6-4 Ai Sugiyama #51 Match data
Jun 6, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Chanda Rubin #53 6-2 1-6 6-2 Ai Sugiyama #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ai Sugiyama #97 #8 2,400 1,951 411 362 53.2% 0 0 0 4 2 6
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ai Sugiyama Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1992 1–4 20.0% #184 1,477 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1993 3–8 27.3% #145 1,487 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1994 9–11 45.0% #72 1,557 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1995 16–17 48.5% #46 1,691 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 1996 22–18 55.0% #28 1,738 0 0 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 1997 31–25 55.4% #21 1,833 0 1 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 1998 37–21 63.8% #18 1,859 0 3 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 1999 27–23 54.0% #24 1,806 0 3 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2000 20–24 45.5% #32 1,687 0 3 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2001 28–25 52.8% #30 1,720 0 3 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2002 35–26 57.4% #24 1,755 0 3 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2003 44–25 63.8% #10 1,915 0 5 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2004 30–22 57.7% #17 1,802 0 6 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2005 28–27 50.9% #29 1,742 0 6 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2006 28–25 52.8% #26 1,742 0 6 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7
31 2007 17–21 44.7% #38 1,632 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2008 26–21 55.3% #31 1,742 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2009 9–19 32.1% #97 1,647 0 6 — — — — — — —