H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ai Sugiyama vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 1-2

Kristie Boogert holds a 2–1 lead over Ai Sugiyama in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kristie Boogert leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Ai Sugiyama leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kristie Boogert won the 2000 US Open second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ai Sugiyama
JPN Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Kristie Boogert #79 6-3 6-4 Ai Sugiyama #27 Match data
Mar 18, 1995* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R128 Hard Kristie Boogert #70 2-6 6-3 6-2 Ai Sugiyama #90 Match data
Feb 13, 1994* Osaka WTA 250 QF Carpet Ai Sugiyama #142 6-3 6-3 Kristie Boogert #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ai Sugiyama #97 #8 2,400 1,951 411 362 53.2% 0 0 0 4 2 6
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 104 139 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ai Sugiyama Kristie Boogert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 1–4 20.0% #184 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 3–8 27.3% #145 1,487 0 0 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0
18 1994 9–11 45.0% #72 1,557 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0
19 1995 16–17 48.5% #46 1,691 0 0 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,494 0 0
20 1996 22–18 55.0% #28 1,738 0 0 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0
21 1997 31–25 55.4% #21 1,833 0 1 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0
22 1998 37–21 63.8% #18 1,859 0 3 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,713 0 0
23 1999 27–23 54.0% #24 1,806 0 3 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,680 0 0
24 2000 20–24 45.5% #32 1,687 0 3 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,615 0 0
25 2001 28–25 52.8% #30 1,720 0 3 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,604 0 0
26 2002 35–26 57.4% #24 1,755 0 3 2000 11–13 45.8% #66 1,623 0 0
27 2003 44–25 63.8% #10 1,915 0 5 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,531 0 0
28 2004 30–22 57.7% #17 1,802 0 6 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,537 0 0
29 2005 28–27 50.9% #29 1,742 0 6 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0
30 2006 28–25 52.8% #26 1,742 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2007 17–21 44.7% #38 1,632 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2008 26–21 55.3% #31 1,742 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2009 9–19 32.1% #97 1,647 0 6 — — — — — — —