H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ai Sugiyama vs Laura Granville H2H: 0-1

Laura Granville holds a 1–0 lead over Ai Sugiyama in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Granville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Granville won the 2006 Los Angeles round of 64 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ai Sugiyama
JPN Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Granville #56 7-5 6-2 Ai Sugiyama #27 Match data Aug 9, 2006* R64 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ai Sugiyama #97 #8 2,400 1,951 416 366 53.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ai Sugiyama Laura Granville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 1–4 20.0% #184 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 3–8 27.3% #145 1,486 0 0 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
18 1994 9–11 45.0% #72 1,556 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0
19 1995 16–17 48.5% #46 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1996 24–19 55.8% #28 1,751 0 0 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0
21 1997 31–25 55.4% #21 1,837 0 1 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0
22 1998 37–21 63.8% #18 1,862 0 3 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0
23 1999 27–23 54.0% #24 1,807 0 3 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0
24 2000 20–25 44.4% #32 1,679 0 3 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0
25 2001 28–25 52.8% #30 1,718 0 3 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0
26 2002 35–26 57.4% #24 1,755 0 3 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0
27 2003 44–25 63.8% #10 1,915 0 5 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0
28 2004 33–23 58.9% #17 1,808 0 6 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0
29 2005 28–27 50.9% #29 1,741 0 6 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0
30 2006 28–25 52.8% #26 1,743 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2007 17–21 44.7% #38 1,633 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2008 26–22 54.2% #31 1,713 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2009 9–19 32.1% #97 1,627 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ai Sugiyama Laura Granville
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2001 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 19 13 32 59.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1998 24 9 33 72.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 1999 18 11 29 62.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2000 11 13 24 45.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2005 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2001 20 14 34 58.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2002 26 16 42 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2003 29 16 45 64.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 22 14 36 61.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 20 17 37 54.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 22 18 40 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 10 15 25 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 7 13 20 35.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 280 216 496 56.5% 59 67 126 46.8% 38 39 77 49.4% 39 44 83 47.0% — 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 170/347 of Ai Sugiyama's and 71/167 of Laura Granville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ai Sugiyama Laura Granville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 8/44 1.4 2.8 61.8% 60.8% 50.1% 51.8% 41.7% 56.7% 47.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/36 1.0 2.4 61.3% 58.6% 50.7% 61.2% 54.8% 55.6% 42.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/27 1.1 1.6 65.1% 64.3% 53.0% 50.2% 56.4% 60.4% 39.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 20/28 1.7 2.6 63.3% 64.3% 46.6% 60.2% 45.3% 58.0% 42.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 23/26 1.8 2.3 67.0% 59.8% 46.1% 58.3% 50.4% 55.3% 40.4%
27 2003 12/69 0.8 5.8 60.8% 64.3% 45.1% 53.4% 43.3% 56.6% 48.3% 2008 2/2 3.0 1.0 73.1% 51.1% 42.9% 43.7% 22.5% 48.9% 30.0%
28 2004 11/56 1.2 4.5 60.8% 64.1% 45.3% 64.6% 47.8% 56.5% 48.7% 2009 2/2 1.5 1.5 56.1% 54.9% 44.4% 29.2% 0.0% 50.3% 29.9%
29 2005 7/55 1.4 5.0 65.8% 58.7% 40.3% 46.6% 51.4% 53.1% 42.6% 2010 2/2 2.0 1.0 58.9% 64.5% 48.8% 33.3% 25.0% 58.0% 30.4%
30 2006 37/53 1.3 3.7 67.8% 60.4% 43.2% 56.7% 47.8% 54.8% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 36/38 1.2 5.6 62.8% 58.7% 42.4% 52.3% 50.3% 52.7% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 41/48 0.9 5.3 63.3% 60.9% 43.5% 52.1% 43.6% 54.4% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 26/28 0.8 4.9 65.4% 58.3% 42.7% 43.8% 45.1% 52.8% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ai Sugiyama Laura Granville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1992 1478 102.6 — — — — +34 — — 30.8% -1.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1487 125.5 — — — — +44 — — 37.0% -0.89 1–4 (20%) — — -0.26 1998 1512 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.12
18 1994 1557 120.7 — — — — +41 — — 47.8% +0.13 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.49 1999 1501 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04
19 1995 1665 135.9 — — — — -9 -11 — 49.3% +0.23 4–7 (36%) 3–0 (100%) 101.9 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 1751 143.7 — — — — -8 -156 -152 54.3% +0.29 5–5 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 99.1 +0.30 2001 1486 117.9 — — — — +27 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — -0.28
21 1997 1837 150.1 — — — — +27 -234 -204 51.5% 0.00 14–8 (64%) 11–8 (58%) 106.9 -1.35 2002 1638 133.0 — — — — -22 — +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79
22 1998 1862 153.1 — — — — +57 -206 -239 60.3% +0.68 12–5 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.41 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59
23 1999 1808 151.0 — — — — +46 -168 -203 53.0% +0.21 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -1.12 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 — 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57
24 2000 1679 137.5 — — — — +24 +5 -92 46.1% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 99.7 -0.80 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 — +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60
25 2001 1719 138.7 — — — — +19 -57 -121 53.7% +0.17 10–11 (48%) 6–2 (75%) 102.9 -0.48 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28
26 2002 1755 141.6 — — — — +15 -109 -67 56.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 8–6 (57%) 100.6 -0.40 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20
27 2003 1915 154.1 +1.48 +3.41 1.113 52.2% -8 -157 -164 58.3% +0.63 22–10 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 105.4 +1.81 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.41
28 2004 1808 144.1 +0.61 +2.40 1.121 52.5% -4 -67 +28 57.5% +0.58 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 97.4 +2.38 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.04
29 2005 1742 133.4 -1.10 -0.52 0.908 47.7% +17 -41 -12 51.1% +0.11 11–16 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 94.4 +2.95 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
30 2006 1744 138.5 -0.78 +0.79 0.988 49.8% +9 -91 +46 50.8% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 2–14 (13%) 94.4 +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1633 125.5 -2.23 +2.56 0.996 50.0% -7 +43 +130 47.3% -0.13 8–9 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 98.7 +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1713 136.4 -0.29 +1.82 0.995 49.6% +26 -71 +32 48.5% -0.19 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1627 135.9 -1.68 -1.34 0.871 46.9% +43 -37 +108 35.6% -0.86 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1952 148.1 -0.87 +1.32 0.986 49.6% +18 -90 -55 52.1% +0.15 142–128 (53%) 85–81 (51%) 103.0 +0.97 — 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.