H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Ai Sugiyama vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 7-8
Lisa Raymond holds a 8–7 lead over Ai Sugiyama in their WTA head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Ai Sugiyama leads 7–6 on hard courts, while Lisa Raymond leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ai Sugiyama won the 2003 New Haven third round 3-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 51
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
7
–
8
15 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2003* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2003* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-0 2-6 6-4 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2002* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-3 6-1 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2002* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 7-5 6-0 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2002* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2002* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 7-6(3) 6-0 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2002* | Memphis | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-2 6-1 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2001* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-1 4-0 (ret.) | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2001* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 7-5 3-6 6-1 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2000* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-2 6-3 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1999* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 1000 | QF | Carpet | Lisa Raymond | 6-3 7-5 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1999* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 7-6 7-5 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1997* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-2 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1997* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-1 6-0 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1996* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | #97 | #8 | 2,400 | 1,951 | 411 | 362 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ai Sugiyama | Lisa Raymond | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #184 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #145 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #46 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #21 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #18 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #32 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #30 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #10 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,802 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2005 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2006 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,632 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2008 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #31 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |