H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ai Sugiyama vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 3-1
Ai Sugiyama holds a 3–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ai Sugiyama leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ai Sugiyama won the 2005 San Diego second round 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 51
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2005* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 3-0 (ret.) | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2004* | Doha | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-3 6-2 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2003* | Philadelphia | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Ai Sugiyama | 6-1 6-4 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | #97 | #8 | 2,400 | 1,951 | 411 | 362 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ai Sugiyama | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #184 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #145 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #46 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #21 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #18 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #32 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #30 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #10 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,802 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2005 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2006 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,632 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #31 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |