H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Ai Sugiyama vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 5-4

Ai Sugiyama holds a 5–4 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Ai Sugiyama leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ai Sugiyama won the 2005 Birmingham third round 7-5 6-4.

JPN Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 9, 2005* Birmingham WTA 500 R32 Grass Ai Sugiyama #26 7-5 6-4 Nicole Pratt #125 Match data
Jul 22, 2004* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Ai Sugiyama #10 6-2 6-4 Nicole Pratt #38 Match data
Feb 27, 2004* Dubai WTA 500 R16 Hard Ai Sugiyama #8 6-2 6-2 Nicole Pratt #51 Match data
Aug 31, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Ai Sugiyama #15 3-6 6-4 6-3 Nicole Pratt #57 Match data
Sep 20, 2002* Tokyo WTA 500 R16 Hard Nicole Pratt #46 6-3 4-6 6-3 Ai Sugiyama #20 Match data
Mar 1, 2002* Scottsdale WTA 500 R16 Hard Nicole Pratt #42 6-2 6-1 Ai Sugiyama #30 Match data
Aug 3, 2001* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Ai Sugiyama #48 6-3 4-1 (ret.) Nicole Pratt #74 Match data
Nov 7, 2000* Philadelphia WTA 500 R32 Carpet Nicole Pratt #56 6-2 7-5 Ai Sugiyama #33 Match data
Apr 13, 2000* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Nicole Pratt #51 6-1 7-5 Ai Sugiyama #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ai Sugiyama #97 #8 2,400 1,951 411 362 53.2% 0 0 0 4 2 6
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ai Sugiyama Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 1–4 20.0% #184 1,477 0 0
17 1993 3–8 27.3% #145 1,487 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1994 9–11 45.0% #72 1,557 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 1995 16–17 48.5% #46 1,691 0 0 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 1996 22–18 55.0% #28 1,738 0 0 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 1997 31–25 55.4% #21 1,833 0 1 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 1998 37–21 63.8% #18 1,859 0 3 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 1999 27–23 54.0% #24 1,806 0 3 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 2000 20–24 45.5% #32 1,687 0 3 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2001 28–25 52.8% #30 1,720 0 3 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2002 35–26 57.4% #24 1,755 0 3 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2003 44–25 63.8% #10 1,915 0 5 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2004 30–22 57.7% #17 1,802 0 6 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2005 28–27 50.9% #29 1,742 0 6 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2006 28–25 52.8% #26 1,742 0 6 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2007 17–21 44.7% #38 1,632 0 6 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 2008 26–21 55.3% #31 1,742 0 6 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 2009 9–19 32.1% #97 1,647 0 6 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1