H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ai Sugiyama vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

Noelle Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Ai Sugiyama in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Noelle Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Noelle Van Lottum won the 1994 Key Biscayne round of 128 2-6 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ai Sugiyama
JPN Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Noelle Van Lottum
FRA Age 54

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Noelle Van Lottum 2-6 6-4 7-5 Ai Sugiyama #112 Match data Mar 12, 1994* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ai Sugiyama #97 #8 2,400 1,951 416 366 53.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Noelle Van Lottum — — — 1,646 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ai Sugiyama Noelle Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
16 1992 1–4 20.0% #184 1,477 0 0 1989 3–2 60.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 1993 3–8 27.3% #145 1,486 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% — 1,580 0 0
18 1994 9–11 45.0% #72 1,556 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% — 1,531 0 0
19 1995 16–17 48.5% #46 1,665 0 0 1992 17–20 45.9% — 1,610 0 1
20 1996 24–19 55.8% #28 1,751 0 0 1993 13–21 38.2% — 1,582 0 1
21 1997 31–25 55.4% #21 1,837 0 1 1994 7–12 36.8% — 1,575 0 1
22 1998 37–21 63.8% #18 1,862 0 3 1995 1–9 10.0% — 1,465 0 1
23 1999 27–23 54.0% #24 1,807 0 3 1996 0–2 0.0% — 1,441 0 1
24 2000 20–25 44.4% #32 1,679 0 3 1997 2–9 18.2% — 1,426 0 1
25 2001 28–25 52.8% #30 1,718 0 3 1998 1–2 33.3% — 1,428 0 1
26 2002 35–26 57.4% #24 1,755 0 3 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,416 0 1
27 2003 44–25 63.8% #10 1,915 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 2004 33–23 58.9% #17 1,808 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2005 28–27 50.9% #29 1,741 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2006 28–25 52.8% #26 1,743 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2007 17–21 44.7% #38 1,633 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2008 26–22 54.2% #31 1,713 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2009 9–19 32.1% #97 1,627 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ai Sugiyama Noelle Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1994 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1997 19 13 32 59.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1998 24 9 33 72.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1999 18 11 29 62.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 11 13 24 45.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2001 20 14 34 58.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 2002 26 16 42 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2003 29 16 45 64.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 22 14 36 61.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 20 17 37 54.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 22 18 40 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 10 15 25 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 7 13 20 35.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 280 216 496 56.5% 59 67 126 46.8% 38 39 77 49.4% 39 44 83 47.0% — 25 41 66 37.9% 22 40 62 35.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 9 7 16 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ai Sugiyama Noelle Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1507 102.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.28
16 1992 1478 102.6 — — — — +34 — — 30.8% -1.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.31 1989 1533 105.7 — — — — +43 — — 53.3% +0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.90
17 1993 1487 125.5 — — — — +44 — — 37.0% -0.89 1–4 (20%) — — -0.26 1990 1581 116.6 — — — — +44 — — 60.0% -0.10 — 1–0 — +0.14
18 1994 1557 120.7 — — — — +41 — — 47.8% +0.13 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.49 1991 1532 111.1 — — — — +43 +16 — 38.8% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 1995 1665 135.9 — — — — -9 -11 — 49.3% +0.23 4–7 (36%) 3–0 (100%) 101.9 +0.28 1992 1610 125.2 — — — — +39 -43 — 48.1% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +1.96
20 1996 1751 143.7 — — — — -8 -156 -152 54.3% +0.29 5–5 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 99.1 +0.30 1993 1583 123.6 — — — — +35 -30 — 40.7% -0.57 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 +0.33
21 1997 1837 150.1 — — — — +27 -234 -204 51.5% 0.00 14–8 (64%) 11–8 (58%) 106.9 -1.35 1994 1576 110.9 — — — — +14 +11 — 40.0% -1.15 4–2 (67%) — — -0.09
22 1998 1862 153.1 — — — — +57 -206 -239 60.3% +0.68 12–5 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.41 1995 1465 92.1 — — — — +55 +58 — 11.1% -3.06 0–2 2–0 — +0.63
23 1999 1808 151.0 — — — — +46 -168 -203 53.0% +0.21 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -1.12 1996 1442 96.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.13
24 2000 1679 137.5 — — — — +24 +5 -92 46.1% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 99.7 -0.80 1997 1427 107.1 — — — — +69 +66 +36 26.9% -1.35 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.01
25 2001 1719 138.7 — — — — +19 -57 -121 53.7% +0.17 10–11 (48%) 6–2 (75%) 102.9 -0.48 1998 1429 97.9 — — — — — +33 — 44.4% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.19
26 2002 1755 141.6 — — — — +15 -109 -67 56.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 8–6 (57%) 100.6 -0.40 1999 1416 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
27 2003 1915 154.1 +1.48 +3.41 1.113 52.2% -8 -157 -164 58.3% +0.63 22–10 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 105.4 +1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1808 144.1 +0.61 +2.40 1.121 52.5% -4 -67 +28 57.5% +0.58 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 97.4 +2.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1742 133.4 -1.10 -0.52 0.908 47.7% +17 -41 -12 51.1% +0.11 11–16 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 94.4 +2.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1744 138.5 -0.78 +0.79 0.988 49.8% +9 -91 +46 50.8% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 2–14 (13%) 94.4 +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1633 125.5 -2.23 +2.56 0.996 50.0% -7 +43 +130 47.3% -0.13 8–9 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 98.7 +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1713 136.4 -0.29 +1.82 0.995 49.6% +26 -71 +32 48.5% -0.19 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1627 135.9 -1.68 -1.34 0.871 46.9% +43 -37 +108 35.6% -0.86 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1952 148.1 -0.87 +1.32 0.986 49.6% +18 -90 -55 52.1% +0.15 142–128 (53%) 85–81 (51%) 103.0 +0.97 — 1646 119.1 — — — — +39 -1 +36 40.7% -0.78 20–29 (41%) 12–11 (52%) 99.0 +3.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.