H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ai Sugiyama vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 0-2
Silvia Farina Elia holds a 2–0 lead over Ai Sugiyama in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 1999 Roland Garros second round 6-4 6-7(4) 11-9.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 51
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-4 6-7(4) 11-9 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-3 7-5 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | #97 | #8 | 2,400 | 1,951 | 411 | 362 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ai Sugiyama | Silvia Farina Elia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #184 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #145 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #46 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #21 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #18 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #32 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #30 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #10 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,802 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,632 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2008 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #31 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |