H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Akemi Nishiya vs Amy Schwartz H2H: 0-1

Amy Schwartz holds a 1–0 lead over Akemi Nishiya in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Amy Schwartz won the 1985 Manhasset round of 32 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Akemi Nishiya
JPN Age 61
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Amy Schwartz
USA Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Schwartz 3-6 6-3 6-2 Akemi Nishiya Match data Sep 12, 1985* R32 Manhasset WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Akemi Nishiya — — — 1,537 10 30 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amy Schwartz — — — 1,557 14 27 34.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Akemi Nishiya Amy Schwartz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 2–2 50.0% — 1,499 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1986 4–2 66.7% — 1,541 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1987 2–5 28.6% — 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 2–7 22.2% — 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1989 3–5 37.5% — 1,484 0 0
20 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,476 0 0
21 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,432 0 0 1991 0–2 0.0% — 1,448 0 0
22 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,412 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1988 5–6 45.5% — 1,460 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,449 0 0
24 1989 5–10 33.3% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1990 0–4 0.0% — 1,450 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1991 0–3 0.0% — 1,419 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Akemi Nishiya Amy Schwartz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 19 28 32.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 7 12 19 36.8% 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Akemi Nishiya Amy Schwartz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1499 92.1 — — — — — — — 44.4% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.04
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1542 110.7 — — — — — +61 — 69.2% +1.00 0–1 — — +1.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 99.0 — — — — +56 +40 — 26.7% -2.00 1–0 2–0 — +0.52
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1481 113.3 — — — — +26 +65 — 30.0% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.18
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1485 97.7 — — — — +34 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.77
20 1985 1438 92.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.07 1990 1477 106.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.35
21 1986 1432 102.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.04 1991 1449 96.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.28
22 1987 1412 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 1461 102.7 — — — — +69 — — 48.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.90 1993 1449 94.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.83 — — — +0.15
24 1989 1480 111.9 — — — — +60 — — 31.3% -1.63 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 1450 101.2 — — — — +48 — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1419 96.0 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1537 102.9 — — — — +62 — — 29.2% -1.62 3–8 (27%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 +4.75 — 1558 103.7 — — — — +37 +57 — 35.2% -1.42 3–5 (38%) 5–1 (83%) 100.3 +5.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.