H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Akemi Nishiya vs Petra Langrova H2H: 0-1

Petra Langrova holds a 1–0 lead over Akemi Nishiya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Langrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Langrova won the 1991 Brisbane International round of 64 2-6 6-2 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Langrova #80 2-6 6-2 6-2 Akemi Nishiya Match data Jan 2, 1991* R64 Brisbane International Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Akemi Nishiya 1,537 10 30 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Petra Langrova #895 #53 453 1,700 81 117 40.9% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Akemi Nishiya Petra Langrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 5–2 71.4% #100 1,581 0 1
19 1989 12–16 42.9% #78 1,620 0 1
20 1985 0–4 0.0% 1,438 0 0 1990 12–15 44.4% #80 1,616 0 1
21 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,432 0 0 1991 14–19 42.4% #86 1,597 0 1
22 1987 0–2 0.0% 1,412 0 0 1992 8–14 36.4% #134 1,561 0 1
23 1988 5–6 45.5% 1,460 0 0 1993 7–11 38.9% #103 1,558 0 1
24 1989 5–10 33.3% 1,480 0 0 1994 5–9 35.7% #106 1,568 0 1
25 1990 0–4 0.0% 1,450 0 0 1995 7–10 41.2% #137 1,571 0 1
26 1991 0–3 0.0% 1,419 0 0 1996 7–6 53.8% #66 1,626 0 1
27 1997 4–14 22.2% #133 1,523 0 1
28 1998 0–1 0.0% #249 1,509 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Akemi Nishiya Petra Langrova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1988 5 0 5 100.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 3 6 9 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
22 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1988 5 6 11 45.5% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1990 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1998 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 9 19 28 32.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 33 49 32.7% 54 63 117 46.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Akemi Nishiya Petra Langrova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1988 1581 119.1 +77 62.5% +0.50 2–0 3–1 (75%) +1.11
19 1989 1621 121.4 -125 +103 43.9% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 102.8 +0.67
20 1985 1438 92.7 20.0% -2.00 0–2 +0.07 1990 1616 124.6 -72 +52 47.6% -0.25 3–6 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.6 -0.15
21 1986 1432 102.2 0.0% -2.50 0–1 -0.04 1991 1597 128.3 -3 +40 40.3% -0.51 5–3 (63%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 +0.13
22 1987 1412 94.9 0.0% -4.00 +0.15 1992 1562 116.3 +4 +55 40.4% -0.72 6–7 (46%) 2–4 (33%) 98.3 +0.27
23 1988 1461 102.7 +69 48.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) +0.90 1993 1559 114.9 +30 +27 45.0% -0.57 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.13
24 1989 1480 111.9 +60 31.3% -1.63 2–2 (50%) 1–0 +0.75 1994 1568 112.8 -26 +63 43.2% -0.95 3–6 (33%) 1–1 +0.21
25 1990 1450 101.2 +48 11.1% -2.89 0–1 -0.12 1995 1572 110.3 -25 +25 40.5% -0.51 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) -0.06
26 1991 1419 96.0 14.3% -2.14 0–1 +0.19 1996 1626 114.6 -34 -13 53.3% +0.07 4–2 (67%) 1–0 +0.08
27 1997 1523 109.5 +46 +26 26.3% -1.79 0–2 +0.21
28 1998 1509 97.6 33.3% -3.33 0–1 +0.03
Career 1537 102.9 +62 29.2% -1.62 3–8 (27%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 +4.75 1701 124.6 -24 +47 42.9% -0.60 32–37 (46%) 18–22 (45%) 98.9 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.