H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Akgul Amanmuradova vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Akgul Amanmuradova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2009 Madrid Open first round 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Akgul Amanmuradova
Uzbekistan Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #98 7-6(5) 6-4 Akgul Amanmuradova #100 Match data May 11, 2009 R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,630 61 102 37.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,465 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,490 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,528 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2008 15–22 40.5% #82 1,525 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,539 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,579 0 0 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,492 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,455 0 0 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,483 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,482 0 0 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,489 0 0 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 9 14 23 39.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2009 6 4 10 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 67 113 40.7% 15 26 41 36.6% 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 129/151 of Akgul Amanmuradova's and 19/20 of Lourdes Domínguez Lino's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2006 2/4 5.0 3.0 59.9% 63.9% 43.8% 38.8% 40.3% 56.9% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 10/16 5.6 2.0 62.6% 66.8% 46.8% 60.7% 60.0% 59.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 30/37 5.5 2.7 61.3% 65.6% 42.2% 60.2% 45.6% 56.6% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 16/19 5.9 2.0 62.8% 66.7% 45.3% 56.1% 37.2% 58.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 26/26 4.7 1.8 66.9% 64.3% 45.4% 50.3% 42.3% 58.0% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 22/23 3.1 2.4 66.6% 59.1% 44.4% 39.9% 46.2% 54.0% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 13/15 4.4 1.0 65.9% 59.9% 47.7% 48.7% 30.7% 56.1% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 4/5 6.3 2.3 66.5% 62.7% 43.8% 59.2% 47.1% 57.4% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 4/4 4.5 1.3 75.1% 66.8% 43.4% 64.6% 31.1% 60.7% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1/1 3.0 4.0 83.8% 38.7% 0.0% 33.3% — 32.4% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 8/9 0.6 1.8 71.4% 55.2% 52.3% 49.6% 51.7% 53.6% 45.7%
35 2019 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.6% 65.7% 32.1% 71.4% 0.0% 50.8% 28.6% 2016 11/11 0.7 3.0 61.2% 54.4% 41.7% 50.1% 47.0% 49.7% 38.3%
Career — 129/163 4.8 2.1 64.8% 63.6% 44.2% 52.8% 42.4% 56.8% 38.3% — 19/282 0.7 2.5 65.5% 54.7% 46.1% 49.9% 49.0% 51.3% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2001 1482 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1472 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1465 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2004 1451 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2005 1507 105.0 — — — — +16 — — 63.2% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.89 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2006 1491 102.4 -0.77 -0.65 0.896 48.1% +3 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.12 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2007 1529 108.8 +0.69 -2.00 1.048 51.1% -9 — — 48.6% -0.28 2–3 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.9 +0.73 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2008 1525 120.6 +0.62 -3.54 0.919 48.6% +1 +77 — 42.2% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 99.4 +0.30 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2009 1539 105.7 +1.49 -2.51 0.958 49.4% +41 +3 — 44.2% -0.14 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 +1.76 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2010 1579 116.9 +1.35 -3.94 0.921 48.4% +27 -59 — 44.4% -0.28 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 +1.64 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2011 1493 104.0 -1.69 -5.44 0.799 45.4% +59 -23 — 33.3% -1.56 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.6 +0.71 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2012 1456 115.4 +0.74 -4.35 0.787 45.2% +39 +29 — 17.2% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.5 -0.79 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2013 1483 113.9 +0.82 -2.38 0.797 46.4% +27 — — 40.0% -0.40 — — — -0.31 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2014 1482 99.1 +0.09 -1.61 1.015 49.9% +28 — — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.75 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 2016 1502 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 2017 1490 91.4 -0.67 -2.70 0.370 29.0% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 2019 1465 97.4 -1.53 -4.65 0.581 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
36 2020 1466 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1434 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1631 113.1 +0.44 -3.64 0.887 47.7% +22 +13 — 39.5% -0.71 15–21 (42%) 22–23 (49%) 97.8 +3.65 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.