H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Akgul Amanmuradova vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 2-1

Akgul Amanmuradova holds a 2–1 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Akgul Amanmuradova leads 2–0 on clay, while Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akgul Amanmuradova won the 2012 Budapest round of 32 6-3 3-6 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Akgul Amanmuradova
Uzbekistan Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Michaella Krajicek
The Netherlands Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Akgul Amanmuradova #107 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) Michaella Krajicek #67 Match data May 3, 2012* R32 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Akgul Amanmuradova #65 6-4 6-3 Michaella Krajicek #45 Match data May 1, 2008* R32 Prague Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Michaella Krajicek #82 6-0 4-6 6-3 Akgul Amanmuradova #257 Match data Oct 9, 2005* F Tashkent Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,630 61 102 37.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Michaella Krajicek #1,134 #30 918 1,802 89 98 47.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Michaella Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #244 1,471 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2005 14–8 63.6% #63 1,653 0 1
17 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 2006 26–16 61.9% #35 1,752 0 3
18 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0 2007 21–25 45.7% #33 1,670 0 3
19 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,465 0 0 2008 3–13 18.8% #203 1,536 0 3
20 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0 2009 4–7 36.4% #128 1,536 0 3
21 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0 2010 2–5 28.6% #145 1,506 0 3
22 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,490 0 0 2011 9–6 60.0% #93 1,589 0 3
23 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,528 0 0 2012 7–9 43.8% #167 1,562 0 3
24 2008 15–22 40.5% #82 1,525 0 0 2013 1–4 20.0% #282 1,536 0 3
25 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,539 0 0 2014 1–1 50.0% #273 1,545 0 3
26 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,579 0 0 2015 1–1 50.0% #178 1,549 0 3
27 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Michaella Krajicek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 5 16 68.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 14 9 23 60.9% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2005 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2008 9 14 23 39.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2009 6 4 10 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 67 113 40.7% 15 26 41 36.6% 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — — 52 53 105 49.5% 18 26 44 40.9% 19 18 37 51.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 129/151 of Akgul Amanmuradova's and 134/184 of Michaella Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Michaella Krajicek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/22 4.4 4.8 58.1% 66.3% 43.8% 49.5% 51.2% 56.2% 43.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 17/42 3.8 4.1 60.9% 62.1% 45.9% 59.5% 48.6% 55.8% 35.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 39/46 4.5 5.1 59.9% 69.1% 44.6% 54.0% 49.3% 59.2% 44.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 16/16 3.5 4.8 60.6% 61.0% 45.5% 39.9% 46.1% 54.8% 37.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 11/11 2.6 5.6 59.8% 65.4% 48.9% 58.8% 39.7% 58.8% 37.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/7 4.0 5.4 60.9% 61.2% 36.9% 48.0% 53.7% 51.7% 39.3%
22 2006 2/4 5.0 3.0 59.9% 63.9% 43.8% 38.8% 40.3% 56.9% 38.6% 2011 14/15 6.1 4.1 52.7% 76.4% 48.5% 45.5% 36.0% 63.2% 38.2%
23 2007 10/16 5.6 2.0 62.6% 66.8% 46.8% 60.7% 60.0% 59.2% 42.7% 2012 16/16 5.6 6.9 52.9% 67.5% 45.5% 45.1% 33.8% 57.1% 38.4%
24 2008 30/37 5.5 2.7 61.3% 65.6% 42.2% 60.2% 45.6% 56.6% 39.9% 2013 5/5 6.0 8.2 51.0% 65.0% 40.1% 47.1% 53.3% 53.1% 38.0%
25 2009 16/19 5.9 2.0 62.8% 66.7% 45.3% 56.1% 37.2% 58.6% 39.6% 2014 2/2 8.0 2.0 63.2% 74.3% 55.9% 55.0% 52.4% 67.6% 37.9%
26 2010 26/26 4.7 1.8 66.9% 64.3% 45.4% 50.3% 42.3% 58.0% 38.7% 2015 2/2 18.5 2.5 67.9% 74.8% 50.7% 65.3% 56.3% 67.0% 23.4%
27 2011 22/23 3.1 2.4 66.6% 59.1% 44.4% 39.9% 46.2% 54.0% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 13/15 4.4 1.0 65.9% 59.9% 47.7% 48.7% 30.7% 56.1% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 4/5 6.3 2.3 66.5% 62.7% 43.8% 59.2% 47.1% 57.4% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 4/4 4.5 1.3 75.1% 66.8% 43.4% 64.6% 31.1% 60.7% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1/1 3.0 4.0 83.8% 38.7% 0.0% 33.3% — 32.4% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.6% 65.7% 32.1% 71.4% 0.0% 50.8% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129/163 4.8 2.1 64.8% 63.6% 44.2% 52.8% 42.4% 56.8% 38.3% — 134/187 4.7 5.1 58.3% 67.0% 45.4% 50.9% 45.4% 57.9% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Michaella Krajicek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1490 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1472 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1653 123.1 -0.34 -0.48 0.988 50.3% +4 -140 -95 60.0% +0.98 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.45
17 2001 1482 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19 2006 1752 128.7 +0.10 -4.98 0.810 46.4% -10 -161 -31 54.0% +0.30 10–1 (91%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.86
18 2002 1472 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07 2007 1671 133.9 +2.45 +0.06 1.081 51.6% -42 -36 +109 46.7% +0.27 7–8 (47%) 3–13 (19%) — -0.19
19 2003 1465 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15 2008 1536 99.3 -1.35 -4.34 0.823 45.9% +17 -23 +207 27.0% -1.33 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.74
20 2004 1451 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 2009 1536 114.7 +1.40 -2.80 0.919 48.8% +22 — +168 40.7% -0.74 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.19
21 2005 1507 105.0 — — — — +16 — — 63.2% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.89 2010 1507 96.3 -2.93 -3.02 0.815 45.9% +30 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.16
22 2006 1491 102.4 -0.77 -0.65 0.896 48.1% +3 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.12 2011 1589 120.2 +2.85 -3.04 1.037 50.4% +35 — — 57.1% +0.40 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.00
23 2007 1529 108.8 +0.69 -2.00 1.048 51.1% -9 — — 48.6% -0.28 2–3 (40%) 5–1 (83%) — +0.73 2012 1562 112.0 -0.14 -3.52 0.895 47.7% +61 -54 — 44.4% -0.53 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.19
24 2008 1525 120.6 +0.62 -3.54 0.919 48.6% +1 +77 — 42.2% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.30 2013 1536 98.4 -0.64 -2.23 0.809 45.9% — — +55 33.3% -1.33 0–2 0–2 — -0.28
25 2009 1539 105.7 +1.49 -2.51 0.958 49.4% +41 +3 — 44.2% -0.14 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.76 2014 1546 103.0 +2.61 -2.09 1.167 52.6% — — — 40.0% +0.80 1–0 0–2 — +0.11
26 2010 1579 116.9 +1.35 -3.94 0.921 48.4% +27 -59 — 44.4% -0.28 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.64 2015 1549 102.0 +0.78 -1.05 0.709 47.8% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.05
27 2011 1493 104.0 -1.69 -5.44 0.799 45.4% +59 -23 — 33.3% -1.56 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1456 115.4 +0.74 -4.35 0.787 45.2% +39 +29 — 17.2% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.79 2017 1529 92.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1483 113.9 +0.82 -2.38 0.797 46.4% +27 — — 40.0% -0.40 — — — -0.31 2018 1512 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1482 99.1 +0.09 -1.61 1.015 49.9% +28 — — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1502 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1490 91.4 -0.67 -2.71 0.370 29.0% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1465 97.4 -1.53 -4.65 0.581 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 2024 1502 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1466 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1434 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1631 113.1 +0.44 -3.64 0.887 47.7% +22 +13 — 39.5% -0.71 15–21 (42%) 22–23 (49%) 97.8 +3.65 — 1803 124.4 +0.82 -2.41 0.938 48.8% +3 -84 +80 47.2% -0.05 35–29 (55%) 24–30 (44%) 100.5 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.