H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Akgul Amanmuradova vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-1

Nicole Vaidisova holds a 1–0 lead over Akgul Amanmuradova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2007 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Akgul Amanmuradova
Uzbekistan Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Vaidisova
CZE Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Vaidisova #10 6-2 6-4 Akgul Amanmuradova #210 Match data May 30, 2007* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,630 61 102 37.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Vaidisova #832 #7 1,981 2,006 155 85 64.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Nicole Vaidisova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2004 14–5 73.7% #75 1,672 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 2005 45–14 76.3% #15 1,948 0 5
17 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 2006 35–17 67.3% #10 1,936 0 6
18 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0 2007 35–14 71.4% #12 1,954 0 6
19 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,465 0 0 2008 17–19 47.2% #41 1,703 0 6
20 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0 2009 7–12 36.8% #175 1,575 0 6
21 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0 2010 1–1 50.0% #666 1,576 0 6
22 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2008 15–22 40.5% #82 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,579 0 0 2015 1–3 25.0% #261 1,564 0 6
27 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Nicole Vaidisova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 12 4 16 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 35 8 43 81.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
17 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 16 10 26 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 24 9 33 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 11 13 24 45.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
20 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2005 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 9 14 23 39.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 6 4 10 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 67 113 40.7% 15 26 41 36.6% 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — — 105 54 159 66.0% 26 17 43 60.5% 18 10 28 64.3% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 129/151 of Akgul Amanmuradova's and 161/240 of Nicole Vaidisova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Nicole Vaidisova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/19 1.0 2.0 51.2% 50.0% 33.3% 14.3% 50.0% 41.9% 39.6%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 17/59 7.0 3.2 61.5% 67.6% 52.6% 54.1% 45.8% 61.8% 44.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 41/52 5.4 3.5 62.1% 68.7% 48.3% 55.4% 42.2% 60.8% 44.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 48/49 6.3 3.4 61.5% 73.7% 49.9% 59.5% 48.0% 64.6% 44.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 31/36 5.2 3.6 61.0% 70.9% 44.7% 49.4% 42.8% 60.6% 40.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 18/19 3.3 4.8 56.2% 63.8% 37.8% 48.5% 47.7% 52.5% 41.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 5.0 3.0 65.2% 77.4% 35.4% 55.0% 45.8% 62.3% 40.1%
22 2006 2/4 5.0 3.0 59.9% 63.9% 43.8% 38.8% 40.3% 56.9% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 10/16 5.6 2.0 62.6% 66.8% 46.8% 60.7% 60.0% 59.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 30/37 5.5 2.7 61.3% 65.6% 42.2% 60.2% 45.6% 56.6% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 16/19 5.9 2.0 62.8% 66.7% 45.3% 56.1% 37.2% 58.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 26/26 4.7 1.8 66.9% 64.3% 45.4% 50.3% 42.3% 58.0% 38.7% 2015 3/4 6.3 2.3 63.6% 59.4% 44.6% 48.1% 53.3% 53.7% 41.5%
27 2011 22/23 3.1 2.4 66.6% 59.1% 44.4% 39.9% 46.2% 54.0% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 13/15 4.4 1.0 65.9% 59.9% 47.7% 48.7% 30.7% 56.1% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 4/5 6.3 2.3 66.5% 62.7% 43.8% 59.2% 47.1% 57.4% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 4/4 4.5 1.3 75.1% 66.8% 43.4% 64.6% 31.1% 60.7% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1/1 3.0 4.0 83.8% 38.7% 0.0% 33.3% — 32.4% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.6% 65.7% 32.1% 71.4% 0.0% 50.8% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129/163 4.8 2.1 64.8% 63.6% 44.2% 52.8% 42.4% 56.8% 38.3% — 161/240 5.6 3.6 61.0% 69.8% 47.0% 54.2% 45.3% 60.9% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Nicole Vaidisova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1672 120.2 -1.78 -0.72 0.682 40.6% +8 -112 — 60.5% +0.53 7–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.63
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1948 146.7 +3.98 +0.60 1.172 53.0% 0 -245 -351 67.2% +1.49 16–2 (89%) 8–9 (47%) 110.8 -0.34
17 2001 1482 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19 2006 1937 151.5 +4.00 +0.94 1.131 52.3% -11 -77 -249 63.2% +0.93 11–8 (58%) 4–7 (36%) 98.8 +0.48
18 2002 1472 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07 2007 1955 155.4 +7.77 +1.32 1.244 54.1% -8 -61 -138 70.1% +1.39 6–7 (46%) 6–4 (60%) 100.0 +0.64
19 2003 1465 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15 2008 1703 127.8 +3.94 -2.60 1.033 50.4% +35 +79 +129 47.7% -0.15 7–7 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 92.1 -0.26
20 2004 1451 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 2009 1576 103.2 -2.86 -1.96 0.879 47.1% +83 +121 — 36.6% -1.02 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +1.38
21 2005 1507 105.0 — — — — +16 — — 63.2% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.89 2010 1577 105.4 +1.21 +0.70 1.062 51.9% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.09
22 2006 1491 102.4 -0.77 -0.65 0.896 48.1% +3 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1529 108.8 +0.69 -2.00 1.048 51.1% -9 — — 48.6% -0.28 2–3 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.9 +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 1525 120.6 +0.62 -3.54 0.919 48.6% +1 +77 — 42.2% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 99.4 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 1539 105.7 +1.49 -2.51 0.958 49.4% +41 +3 — 44.2% -0.14 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 +1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 1579 116.9 +1.35 -3.94 0.921 48.4% +27 -59 — 44.4% -0.28 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 +1.64 2015 1565 115.0 -0.33 +1.19 0.897 48.2% +67 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.40
27 2011 1493 104.0 -1.69 -5.44 0.799 45.4% +59 -23 — 33.3% -1.56 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1456 115.4 +0.74 -4.35 0.787 45.2% +39 +29 — 17.2% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.5 -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1483 113.9 +0.82 -2.38 0.797 46.4% +27 — — 40.0% -0.40 — — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1482 99.1 +0.09 -1.61 1.015 49.9% +28 — — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1502 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1490 91.4 -0.67 -2.70 0.370 29.0% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1465 97.4 -1.53 -4.65 0.581 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1466 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1434 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1631 113.1 +0.44 -3.64 0.887 47.7% +22 +13 — 39.5% -0.71 15–21 (42%) 22–23 (49%) 97.8 +3.65 — 2006 146.1 +4.19 0.00 1.102 51.8% +10 -78 -113 60.3% +0.77 49–27 (64%) 23–26 (47%) 103.4 +0.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.