H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Akgul Amanmuradova vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0
Akgul Amanmuradova holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akgul Amanmuradova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akgul Amanmuradova won the 2011 US Open first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UZB
Age 42
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Akgul Amanmuradova | 6-4 6-2 | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akgul Amanmuradova | #1,097 | #50 | 1,031 | 1,631 | 61 | 101 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akgul Amanmuradova | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #607 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2005 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #197 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2007 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #114 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #459 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |