H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Akiko Kijimuta vs Ann Grossman H2H: 1-2
Ann Grossman holds a 2–1 lead over Akiko Kijimuta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1992 Indian Wells second round 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1992* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 7-6 6-0 | Akiko Kijimuta | Match data |
| May 8, 1991* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Akiko Kijimuta | 6-4 2-6 7-6 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Ann Grossman | 6-4 6-1 | Akiko Kijimuta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Kijimuta | #565 | #49 | 21 | 1,695 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Kijimuta | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #172 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #124 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #115 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #66 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #149 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |