H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Akiko Kijimuta vs Nana Smith H2H: 1-1
Akiko Kijimuta and Nana Smith are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Akiko Kijimuta leads 1–0 on carpet, while Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1990 Tokyo Japan Open third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1990* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nana Smith | 6-3 6-3 | Akiko Kijimuta | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1990* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Akiko Kijimuta | 7-6 2-6 6-2 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Kijimuta | #565 | #49 | 21 | 1,695 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Kijimuta | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #172 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #124 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #115 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #66 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #149 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |