H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Akiko Kijimuta vs Petra Langrova H2H: 1-1
Akiko Kijimuta and Petra Langrova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Akiko Kijimuta leads 1–0 on clay, while Petra Langrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Langrova won the 1992 Boca Raton second round 6-4 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1992* | Boca Raton | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Petra Langrova | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Akiko Kijimuta | Match data |
| May 31, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Akiko Kijimuta | 7-5 6-1 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Kijimuta | #565 | #49 | 21 | 1,695 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Kijimuta | Petra Langrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #172 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #124 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #115 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #66 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #149 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |