Akiko Kijimuta
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 1, 1992 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 3 | 0 | 3 | May 31, 1992 | H2H |
| Ann Grossman | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 24, 1992 | H2H |
| Rika Hiraki | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 7, 1992 | H2H |
| Mercedes Paz | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Akiko Kijimuta and Susan Sloane Lundy are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Akiko Kijimuta leads 1–0 on clay, while Susan Sloane Lundy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akiko Kijimuta won the 1991 Strasbourg Open round of 32 5-7 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Kijimuta | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data | May 23, 1991* | R32 | Strasbourg Open | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | Akiko Kijimuta | Match data | Feb 24, 1989* | R16 | Wichita | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Kijimuta | #565 | #49 | 21 | 1,694 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,882 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Akiko Kijimuta | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #172 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #124 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #115 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #149 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Akiko Kijimuta | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1986 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1988 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 1987 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1990 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1989 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1992 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 28 | 52 | 80 | 35.0% | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | Career | 66 | 62 | 128 | 51.6% | 21 | 22 | 43 | 48.8% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Akiko Kijimuta | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1983 | 1491 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.26 | 1985 | 1485 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.22 |
| 1984 | 1477 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.02 | 1986 | 1596 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -38 | — | 43.5% | -0.37 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.3 | -0.48 |
| 1985 | 1502 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +60 | — | 54.5% | -0.36 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.92 | 1987 | 1636 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -71 | — | 39.3% | -0.80 | 6–2 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | 105.9 | -1.68 |
| 1986 | 1533 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | +56 | — | — | 51.9% | +0.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +2.11 | 1988 | 1846 | 136.9 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -203 | — | 53.0% | +0.20 | 11–2 (85%) | 3–1 (75%) | 113.8 | -0.25 |
| 1987 | 1599 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -54 | +3 | 43.8% | -0.46 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.32 | 1989 | 1755 | 137.6 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -18 | — | 57.9% | +0.67 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–5 (38%) | 94.8 | -0.26 |
| 1988 | 1555 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | +57 | 38.6% | -0.86 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.3 | +0.21 | 1990 | 1782 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -73 | — | 56.5% | +0.31 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–5 (44%) | 99.8 | -0.62 |
| 1989 | 1628 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | -87 | -45 | +33 | 52.9% | -0.33 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–0 | — | +0.54 | 1991 | 1653 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -8 | — | 46.3% | -0.46 | 1–5 (17%) | — | — | +0.61 |
| 1990 | 1581 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | -65 | — | — | 26.5% | -1.65 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.3 | -0.33 | 1992 | 1580 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.63 | — | — | — | -0.33 |
| 1991 | 1624 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | -59 | +2 | +22 | 44.6% | -0.49 | 7–7 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.7 | -1.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1579 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | -67 | +65 | — | 32.6% | -1.46 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.5 | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1550 | 91.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1694 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -36 | +13 | +26 | 41.0% | -0.77 | 27–30 (47%) | 13–17 (43%) | 100.8 | +1.92 | Career | 1882 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -67 | — | 49.0% | -0.10 | 27–19 (59%) | 13–16 (45%) | 103.8 | -1.48 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 1, 1992 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 3 | 0 | 3 | May 31, 1992 | H2H |
| Ann Grossman | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 24, 1992 | H2H |
| Rika Hiraki | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 7, 1992 | H2H |
| Mercedes Paz | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 20, 1992 | H2H |
| Linda Ferrando | 4 | 1 | 5 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 3 | 2 | 5 | Sep 14, 1989 | H2H |
| Beverly Bowes | 3 | 1 | 4 | Oct 18, 1990 | H2H |
| Patty Fendick | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 29, 1990 | H2H |