Akiko Morigami
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 29, 2006 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 26, 2007 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 30, 2006 | H2H |
| Aiko Nakamura | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 22, 2008 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Barbara Schett holds a 2–0 lead over Akiko Morigami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 2003 Bali round of 32 6-7(2) 7-5 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | 6-7(2) 7-5 7-6(5) | Akiko Morigami | Match data | Sep 11, 2003* | R32 | Bali | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Barbara Schett | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | Akiko Morigami | Match data | May 28, 2003* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,716 | 79 | 109 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,976 | 259 | 228 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2004 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #67 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,759 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,751 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 2002 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 23 | 2003 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 24 | 2004 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2000 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 25 | 2005 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2001 | 18 | 15 | 33 | 54.5% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2006 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | 2007 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2008 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 50 | 72 | 122 | 41.0% | 17 | 22 | 39 | 43.6% | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | 114 | 112 | 226 | 50.4% | 102 | 73 | 175 | 58.3% | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 31 | 31 | 62 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 74/180 of Akiko Morigami's and 14/73 of Barbara Schett's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 23 | 2003 | 5/25 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 60.2% | 62.7% | 43.9% | 58.8% | 42.0% | 54.3% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 6/39 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 59.3% | 56.8% | 49.1% | 53.4% | 52.8% | 54.2% | 46.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 11/38 | 2.3 | 4.5 | 56.6% | 62.4% | 42.3% | 56.7% | 53.5% | 53.3% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 13/28 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 63.3% | 53.5% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 35.4% | 51.8% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 26/34 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 64.9% | 58.4% | 43.4% | 51.7% | 50.3% | 53.2% | 46.6% | 2003 | 7/39 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 61.7% | 62.8% | 46.0% | 58.0% | 34.7% | 56.3% | 42.4% |
| 28 | 2008 | 8/11 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 69.5% | 52.9% | 40.0% | 46.4% | 52.1% | 49.4% | 42.0% | 2004 | 5/32 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 62.9% | 60.9% | 41.9% | 49.1% | 41.2% | 54.1% | 45.3% |
| 29 | 2009 | 5/5 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 64.0% | 49.9% | 35.5% | 40.4% | 52.4% | 45.6% | 37.9% | 2005 | 2/2 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 55.0% | 64.3% | 40.4% | 74.1% | 41.1% | 53.7% | 39.3% |
| Career | — | 74/188 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 63.0% | 57.2% | 43.2% | 51.0% | 48.1% | 52.2% | 44.4% | — | 14/487 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 61.2% | 62.4% | 43.7% | 57.1% | 38.0% | 55.2% | 43.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1492 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1487 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.21 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1547 | 118.8 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +19 | — | 45.0% | -0.25 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–0 | — | -0.73 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1531 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +72 | — | 44.9% | -0.65 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–3 (63%) | 102.0 | +0.38 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1585 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | -34 | +53 | — | 46.3% | +0.24 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–5 (29%) | 96.2 | -0.72 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1759 | 146.4 | — | — | — | — | -85 | +20 | — | 54.6% | +0.42 | 10–7 (59%) | 1–6 (14%) | 103.2 | -1.38 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1752 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | -105 | +101 | — | 53.3% | +0.26 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.6 | +0.55 |
| 22 | 2002 | 1501 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 35.3% | -0.88 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.03 | 1998 | 1822 | 150.4 | — | — | — | — | -60 | +37 | — | 58.2% | +0.72 | 7–14 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | 94.3 | -1.19 |
| 23 | 2003 | 1585 | 121.6 | -0.48 | -0.28 | 0.937 | 48.7% | -8 | -100 | +67 | 51.7% | -0.02 | 0–8 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 92.7 | +0.18 | 1999 | 1937 | 163.4 | — | — | — | — | -17 | -70 | -291 | 62.7% | +1.08 | 13–9 (59%) | 8–9 (47%) | 101.1 | -0.50 |
| 24 | 2004 | 1596 | 122.6 | -0.53 | +1.15 | 1.023 | 50.6% | -43 | -61 | +14 | 45.8% | -0.13 | 3–8 (27%) | 4–5 (44%) | 97.1 | -1.06 | 2000 | 1825 | 147.2 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +52 | — | 58.5% | +0.52 | 9–12 (43%) | 4–7 (36%) | 90.3 | +1.95 |
| 25 | 2005 | 1635 | 126.1 | -0.99 | -0.37 | 0.949 | 49.0% | -19 | -61 | -66 | 51.2% | +0.07 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.9 | +0.77 | 2001 | 1760 | 148.2 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +63 | -107 | 53.2% | +0.46 | 8–8 (50%) | 7–9 (44%) | 95.6 | -0.61 |
| 26 | 2006 | 1631 | 126.4 | -2.35 | +0.38 | 0.902 | 47.3% | -29 | -15 | -35 | 41.4% | -0.71 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -1.77 | 2002 | 1752 | 138.0 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +19 | — | 54.5% | +0.35 | 6–7 (46%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | +0.34 |
| 27 | 2007 | 1648 | 131.2 | -1.85 | +2.31 | 0.995 | 49.7% | -28 | -24 | -1 | 48.0% | -0.25 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–5 (29%) | 95.4 | -1.63 | 2003 | 1625 | 120.3 | +0.36 | -0.33 | 0.971 | 49.1% | -22 | +119 | — | 40.7% | -0.78 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.2 | -0.90 |
| 28 | 2008 | 1565 | 114.3 | -2.67 | -1.70 | 0.830 | 45.9% | +7 | — | — | 30.4% | -1.26 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | -0.43 | 2004 | 1575 | 114.7 | -0.23 | -0.21 | 0.988 | 49.7% | +19 | +86 | +31 | 43.8% | -0.29 | 5–6 (45%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.9 | +0.88 |
| 29 | 2009 | 1573 | 99.5 | -3.38 | -1.25 | 0.696 | 41.5% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.22 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.42 | 2005 | 1577 | 100.5 | +0.57 | +0.30 | 0.850 | 47.5% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.22 |
| Career | — | 1717 | 128.3 | -1.80 | +0.63 | 0.928 | 48.2% | -20 | -48 | -1 | 45.7% | -0.32 | 14–35 (29%) | 11–17 (39%) | 88.1 | -2.30 | — | 1977 | 148.8 | +0.18 | -0.20 | 0.959 | 49.1% | -17 | +47 | -124 | 53.4% | +0.32 | 80–87 (48%) | 48–61 (44%) | 91.7 | -0.42 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 29, 2006 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 26, 2007 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 30, 2006 | H2H |
| Aiko Nakamura | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 22, 2008 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | 0 | 11 | 11 | Mar 8, 2001 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 4 | 5 | 9 | Nov 4, 2000 | H2H |
| Elena Likhovtseva | 7 | 1 | 8 | Mar 10, 2004 | H2H |
| Chanda Rubin | 4 | 4 | 8 | Sep 19, 2003 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 3 | 5 | 8 | May 15, 2003 | H2H |