H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Akiko Morigami vs Camille Pin H2H: 3-0
Akiko Morigami holds a 3–0 lead over Camille Pin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Akiko Morigami leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Akiko Morigami won the 2007 Cincinnati third round 4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2007* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Akiko Morigami | 4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(2) | Camille Pin | Match data |
| May 12, 2007* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Akiko Morigami | 6-3 6-1 | Camille Pin | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2005* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Akiko Morigami | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Camille Pin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Camille Pin | #1,143 | #61 | 752 | 1,619 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Camille Pin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |