H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Akiko Morigami vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 1-0
Akiko Morigami holds a 1–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akiko Morigami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akiko Morigami won the 2004 US Open first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Akiko Morigami | 6-2 6-2 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |