H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Akiko Morigami vs Laura Granville H2H: 1-1
Akiko Morigami and Laura Granville are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Akiko Morigami won the 2004 Hobart third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2004* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Akiko Morigami | 6-2 6-4 | Laura Granville | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2003* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Granville | 6-1 6-2 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Laura Granville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |