H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Akiko Morigami vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 2-0
Akiko Morigami holds a 2–0 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Akiko Morigami leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akiko Morigami won the 2008 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Akiko Morigami | 6-2 6-2 | Michaella Krajicek | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2005* | Memphis | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Akiko Morigami | 6-7(2) 7-6(7) 6-4 | Michaella Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Michaella Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |