H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Akiko Morigami vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-2
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 2–0 lead over Akiko Morigami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Vaidisova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2005 Japan Open third round 4-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2005* | Japan Open | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2005* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-2 6-1 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |