H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Akiko Morigami vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 0-1
Tatiana Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Akiko Morigami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2003 Australian Open second round 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Tatiana Panova | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Tatiana Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |