H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alberta Brianti vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Alberta Brianti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2012 Strasbourg third round 6-4 0-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2012* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Tamira Paszek | 6-4 0-6 6-4 | Alberta Brianti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberta Brianti | #908 | #55 | 1,066 | 1,646 | 53 | 93 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberta Brianti | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #154 | 1,398 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,367 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #91 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #70 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |