H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Aleksandra Krunic vs Elizabeth Halbauer.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleksandra Krunic | 6-2 6-2 | Elizabeth Halbauer | Match data | Apr 1, 2017 | Q1 | Charleston Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Elizabeth Halbauer | — | — | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aleksandra Krunic | Elizabeth Halbauer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #144 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,603 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Aleksandra Krunic | Elizabeth Halbauer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2011 | 1504 | 105.6 | +1.42 | +0.02 | 2.172 | 63.5% | — | — | — | 33.3% | +0.33 | — | — | — | +0.40 | 2016 | 1488 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 1526 | 101.6 | -1.43 | +0.94 | 1.036 | 51.0% | +12 | — | — | 62.5% | +1.00 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.27 | 2017 | 1475 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 1463 | 96.7 | -1.74 | -1.39 | 0.941 | 48.2% | +24 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.37 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–1 | — | +0.48 | 2018 | 1474 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 1524 | 119.6 | -0.18 | -0.41 | 0.902 | 48.4% | +2 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.46 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.31 | 2019 | 1443 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1543 | 109.3 | -2.03 | -3.19 | 0.832 | 46.3% | -35 | -23 | +122 | 40.0% | -0.91 | 4–4 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.3 | +0.06 | 2020 | 1428 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 1595 | 118.6 | -1.15 | -1.51 | 0.893 | 47.6% | -54 | +15 | +43 | 27.3% | -1.30 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 1753 | 130.9 | +2.13 | +3.51 | 1.197 | 53.9% | -68 | +21 | — | 59.2% | +0.68 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–1 | — | +0.88 | 2022 | 1421 | 93.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 1714 | 131.0 | -0.44 | -0.20 | 0.992 | 49.5% | -69 | +26 | +49 | 44.3% | -0.43 | 8–5 (62%) | 5–3 (63%) | 105.6 | -0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 1557 | 107.2 | -2.43 | -3.32 | 0.836 | 46.4% | -17 | +146 | — | 27.5% | -1.58 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 1644 | 126.9 | +1.13 | +0.71 | 1.067 | 51.3% | -4 | +67 | — | 43.5% | +0.17 | 1–0 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 1635 | 120.3 | +0.48 | +1.43 | 1.042 | 50.8% | -31 | +63 | +22 | 48.8% | -0.05 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.2 | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 1633 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 1604 | 109.4 | -1.80 | -1.53 | 0.858 | 46.5% | -21 | — | +83 | 30.4% | -1.48 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.5 | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 1566 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +73 | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 1551 | 104.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1772 | 124.4 | -0.34 | -0.21 | 0.983 | 49.6% | -39 | +40 | +64 | 42.5% | -0.51 | 23–30 (43%) | 18–19 (49%) | 97.4 | -0.11 | — | 1500 | 94.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 8, 2018 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 29, 2022 | H2H |
| Lesia Tsurenko | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 30, 2019 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 21, 2019 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 4 | 0 | 4 | May 16, 2018 | H2H |
No career rivalry data available.