H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Aleksandra Krunic vs Kimiko Date H2H: 1-0

Aleksandra Krunic holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aleksandra Krunic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aleksandra Krunic won the 2017 Japan Women's Open first round 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Aleksandra Krunic
Serbia Age 33 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aleksandra Krunic #67 6-0 6-0 Kimiko Date #1191 Match data Sep 14, 2017* R32 Japan Women's Open WTA 250 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Aleksandra Krunic #470 #39 1,210 1,770 86 118 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Aleksandra Krunic Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2011 2–2 50.0% #223 1,504 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2012 2–1 66.7% #165 1,525 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2013 0–4 0.0% #151 1,463 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0
21 2014 5–6 45.5% #87 1,525 0 0 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2015 12–19 38.7% #108 1,544 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2
23 2016 4–12 25.0% #144 1,595 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2017 20–13 60.6% #54 1,751 0 1 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5
25 2018 19–21 47.5% #55 1,731 0 2 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7
26 2019 5–14 26.3% #163 1,562 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2021 6–6 50.0% #128 1,645 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2022 9–10 47.4% #115 1,636 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2024 2–7 22.2% #286 1,605 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2025 0–3 0.0% #468 1,566 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Aleksandra Krunic Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2012 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2018 8 14 22 36.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2019 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 68 109 37.6% 33 39 72 45.8% 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Aleksandra Krunic Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
18 2011 1504 105.6 +1.42 +0.02 2.172 63.5% — — — 33.3% +0.33 — — +0.36 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06
19 2012 1526 101.6 -1.43 +0.94 1.036 51.0% +12 — — 62.5% +1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.26 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20
20 2013 1463 96.7 -1.74 -1.39 0.941 48.2% +24 — — 27.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +0.57 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17
21 2014 1525 119.7 -0.18 -0.41 0.902 48.4% +1 — — 46.2% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 +0.23 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85
22 2015 1544 109.5 -2.03 -3.19 0.832 46.3% -35 -25 +122 40.0% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 6–2 (75%) +0.41 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50
23 2016 1595 118.4 -1.15 -1.51 0.893 47.6% -54 +14 +44 27.3% -1.30 0–1 1–1 -0.99 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12
24 2017 1752 130.6 +1.74 +3.23 1.172 53.4% -67 +19 — 59.2% +0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–1 +0.73 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54
25 2018 1731 133.3 -0.40 -0.30 0.992 49.5% -73 +7 +32 45.1% -0.32 8–5 (62%) 5–3 (63%) -0.93 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14
26 2019 1563 107.4 -2.47 -3.25 0.836 46.4% -18 +140 — 27.5% -1.58 1–3 (25%) 0–1 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 1646 126.9 +1.18 +0.90 1.067 51.3% -3 +64 — 43.5% +0.17 1–0 0–3 (0%) -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 1636 120.5 +0.49 +1.51 1.042 50.8% -30 +62 +26 48.8% -0.05 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 1634 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1606 109.8 -1.80 -1.53 0.858 46.5% -22 — +84 30.4% -1.48 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1567 107.0 — — — — — +73 — 25.0% -2.50 0–2 — -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1551 104.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16
Career — 1770 124.7 -0.38 -0.23 0.981 49.5% -39 +35 +61 42.6% -0.49 23–30 (43%) 18–19 (49%) -0.29 — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.