H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexandra Fusai vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 2-1
Alexandra Fusai holds a 2–1 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Alexandra Fusai leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexandra Fusai won the 1997 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 52
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alexandra Fusai | 6-2 6-2 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| May 19, 1994* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Alexandra Fusai | 6-4 7-5 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1993* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ginger Helgeson | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | Alexandra Fusai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Fusai | #1,030 | #37 | 691 | 1,759 | 89 | 147 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Alexandra Fusai | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #92 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #39 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #177 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #144 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |