H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Alexandra Fusai vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 1-2
Larisa Savchenko holds a 2–1 lead over Alexandra Fusai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1998 Birmingham third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 52
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1998* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 7-5 6-2 | Alexandra Fusai | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1997* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Alexandra Fusai | 6-2 7-6 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1996* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Larisa Savchenko | 7-5 6-1 | Alexandra Fusai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Fusai | #1,030 | #37 | 691 | 1,759 | 89 | 147 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Alexandra Fusai | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #92 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #39 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #177 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #144 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |